To Those who have Nothing to Hide
If you have nothing to hide, this is for you. There will be no theoretical arguments for privacy here. Those don’t work. Instead, see what you and society have at stake:
Your cost of living will increase
Various hotel booking websites were found to display significantly higher prices to individuals in the San Francisco Bay Area than others. This is no coincidence: it is a practice known as surveillance pricing, and it’s catching on like fire in the travel and retail sectors. Surveillance pricing is the practice of gathering excessive information about customers to charge them personalized prices, often the maximum price they are predicted to pay. Surveillance pricing doesn’t happen only on travel websites, it’s coming to grocery and retail stores near you. Your cost of living will increase due to surveillance pricing.
Your identity will be stolen
Identity theft is at an all-time high and continues to rise. Fuelling the flame are data breaches from companies holding your sensitive information, making it easier than ever for fraudsters to steal your money. Many of these data collectors never told you they were recording all of that information, or if they did, they buried it in a word salad terms of service agreement, holding you hostage from the service unless you accepted. An example of this would be rental car companies that require a scan of your driver’s license that is then uploaded to the cloud and stored potentially indefinitely (a driver’s license is required to drive the car of course, but why is a cloud upload of your driver’s license required?). The biggest company providing that cloud and identity verification service had their entire database of more than 153 million driver’s licenses breached. To put that into perspective, there were about 240,000,000 licensed drivers in the United States in 2024 [1]. That’s 63.75% of all U.S. driver’s licenses, and 44.6% of the United States population on September 1st 2026 [2]. All you get is some measly credit monitoring for a few years, then you’re on your own.
You make it easy for stalkers
Outside of illegal data breaches, your data is being sold and traded—legally, by the way—by data brokers. Are you comfortable knowing that anyone can buy from them an extensive dossier on you? The digital equivalent of those Manila folders you see in Hollywood spy movies with a paper-clipped photograph of the person attached. Whoever pays will know not only basic details such as where you live and what you do for work, but potentially granular details like, say, your habit of grabbing a large iced coffee on the way to work at the Dunkin’ Donuts 3.8 miles away from home, usually ordered using the app right before you get out of the house. Lives have already been lost due to data brokers.
- Did you know that Kia, the car manufacturer, collects information about your “sex life”, as stated in their privacy policy?1
- Did you agree to have your mental health data sold to the highest bidder when you started using a mental health app to get help?
- Does a police department make you feel safe when an officer uses a nationwide vehicle surveillance system to stalk their romantic interests?
- Would you want your child to be held at gunpoint because an AI surveillance system mistook their bag of chips for a gun?
- Is it acceptable for an innocent (proven after the fact) grandmother to be jailed for months just because AI facial recognition flagged her in error?
- China’s wields their national surveillance system to oppress the Uyghur people, sending them to “re-education camps”. We already have most of the surveillance infrastructure to do the same kind of oppression. What’s stopping it from happening in the United States, and you from being targeted?
- The Holocaust. Jews had nothing to hide, until the Nazis initiated genocide. Suddenly they had everything to hide.
The nothing to hide argument fails to consider who defines what is “worth hiding”. All it takes the people in power to change their minds. I hope I changed your mind about privacy. If I did, share this page with people who say they have nothing to hide.
Also check out:
- The Wikipedia page dedicated to this logical fallacy
- A form to fill out if you have nothing to hide (don’t actually submit it)
- Bruce Schneier’s statement on this matter
- The Ludlow Institute’s statement on this matter
- Private Internet Access’s blog post on this matter
- Threema’s blog post on this matter
I would have linked to an archived version of the privacy policy, but Kia explicitly blacklisted their website from being archived on the Internet Archive. Why would they block their site from being archived? Do they want to hide their revision history from people with sharp eyes? ↩︎